Comparative of Digital Terrain Model Quality Based on Cloth Simulation Filter and Simple Outlier Elimination in LiDAR Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69606/geography.v4i1.449Keywords:
Digital Terrain Model, Mount Aso, ground filtering, LiDAR, point cloudAbstract
The quality of Digital Terrain Models (DTM) from LiDAR data is highly dependent on the effectiveness of the ground filtering process, especially in areas with complex mountainous topography and dense vegetation cover. This study aims to systematically analyze and compare the quality of DTMs generated from three different processing schemes, namely Raw DTM, Simple Outlier Elimination DTM (ELM), and Cloth Simulation Filter DTM (CSF), using LiDAR point cloud data on Mount Aso, Japan. The methods used involved ground filtering using CSF and ELM, followed by IDW interpolation, as well as descriptive statistical evaluation and Hillshade visualization with enhanced Z Factor. The ELM filter proved ineffective in producing statistics identical to the raw DTM, while CSF successfully reduced the average elevation from 130.73 m to 124.06 m and confirmed that vegetation noise was eliminated. In complex terrains, future LiDAR research should prioritize adaptive algorithms like CSF over simple statistical filters to ensure higher accuracy in digital terrain representation.
References
Baltsavias, E. P. (1999). A Comparison between Photogrammetry and Laser Scanning. ISPRS Journal of photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54(2-3), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2716(99)00014-3
Cai, S., & Yu, S. (2023). Filtering Airborne LiDAR Data in Forested Environments Based on Multi-Directional Narrow Window and Cloth Simulation. Remote Sensing, 15(5), 1400. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15051400
Cai, S., Yu, S., Hui, Z., & Tang, Z. (2023). ICSF: an Improved Cloth Simulation Filtering Algorithm for Airborne LiDAR Data Based on Morphological Operations. Forests, 14(8), 1520. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14081520
Chen, C., Guo, J., Wu, H., Li, Y., & Shi, B. (2021). Performance Comparison of Filtering Algorithms for High-Density Airborne LiDAR Point Clouds Over Complex LandScapes. Remote Sensing, 13(14), 2663. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13142663
Elaksher, A., Ali, T., & Alharthy, A. (2023). A Quantitative Assessment of LiDAR Data Accuracy. Remote Sensing, 15(2), 442. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15020442
Graf, L., Moreno-de-las-Heras, M., Ruiz, M., Calsamiglia, A., García-Comendador, J., Fortesa, J., López-Tarazón, J. A., & Estrany, J. (2018). Accuracy Assessment of Digital Terrain Model Dataset Sources for Hydrogeomorphological Modelling in Small Mediterranean Catchments. Remote Sensing, 10(12), 2014. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10122014
Guan, S., Yuan, M., & Zheng, H. (2025). Efficient Vegetation Filtering Method using K-means Clustering Algorithm: Case Study of High Steep Rock Slope. Frontiers in Earth Science, 13, 1680510. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2025.1680510
Huang, S., Liu, L., Jian, D. O. N. G., & Xiongjun, F. (2020). Review of Ground Filtering Algorithms for Vehicle LiDAR Scans Point Cloud Data. Guang Dian Gong Cheng= Opto-Electronic Engineering, 47(12), 190688. https://doi.org/10.12086/oee.2020.190688
Jenny, B., & Hurni, L. (2011). Studying Cartographic Heritage: Analysis and Visualization of Geometric Distortions. Computers & Graphics, 35(2), 402-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2011.01.005
Li, F., Zhu, H., Luo, Z., Shen, H., & Li, L. (2021). An Adaptive Surface Interpolation Filter Using Cloth Simulation and Relief Amplitude for Airborne Laser Scanning Data. Remote Sensing, 13(15), 2938. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13152938
Li, Y., Ma, L., Zhong, Z., Liu, F., Chapman, M. A., Cao, D., & Li, J. (2020). Deep learning for LiDAR Point Clouds in Autonomous Driving: A review. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 32(8), 3412-3432. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3015992
Lu, G. Y., & Wong, D. W. (2008). An adaptive Inverse-Distance Weighting Spatial Interpolation Technique. Computers & Geosciences, 34(9), 1044-1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.07.010
Meng, X., Currit, N., & Zhao, K. (2010). Ground Filtering Algorithms for Airborne LiDAR Data: A Review of Critical Issues. Remote Sensing, 2(3), 833-860. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs2030833
Pike, R. J., Evans, I. S., & Hengl, T. (2009). Geomorphometry: A Brief Guide. Developments in soil science, 33, 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2481(08)00001-9
Silva, C. A., Klauberg, C., Hentz, Â. M. K., Corte, A. P. D., Ribeiro, U., & Liesenberg, V. (2018). Comparing the Performance of Ground Filtering Algorithms for Terrain Modeling in a Forest Environment using Airborne LiDAR data. Floresta e Ambiente, 25(2), e20160150. https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.015016
Sithole, G., & Vosselman, G. (2004). Experimental Comparison of filter Algorithms for Bare-Earth Extraction from Airborne Laser Scanning Point Clouds. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 59(1-2), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2004.05.004
Wang, J., Cornelissen, P., & Kissling, W. D. (2025). A Workflow for Extracting Ungulate Trails in Wetlands Using 3D Point Clouds Obtained from Airborne Laser Scanning. Frontiers in Remote Sensing, 6, 1599128. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2025.1599128
Yarroudh, A., Nys, G. A., & Hajji, R. (2023). 3D Modeling of Road Infrastructures According to CityGML 3.0 and its CityJSON Encoding. In International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 48, 63-70. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-1-w2-2023-63-2023
Zhang, W., Qi, J., Wan, P., Wang, H., Xie, D., Wang, X., & Yan, G. (2016). An Easy-to-Use Airborne LiDAR Data Filtering Method Based on Cloth Simulation. Remote Sensing, 8(6), 501. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8060501
Zhao, X., Su, Y., Li, W., Hu, T., Liu, J., & Guo, Q. (2018). A comparison of LiDAR Filtering Algorithms in Vegetated Mountain Areas. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 44(4), 287-298. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2018.1481738
Zhou, X., Xing, M., He, B., Wang, J., Song, Y., Shang, J., Liao, C., Xu, M., & Ni, X. (2023). A Ground Point Fitting Method for Winter Wheat Height Estimation Using UAV-Based SfM Point Cloud Data. Drones, 7(7), 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7070406
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Randi Adrian Saputra, Septianto Aldiansyah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.



