AI Usage Policy in Scientific Writing

 

TSS supports the responsible and transparent use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in scholarly publishing while maintaining the highest standards of research integrity, academic honesty, and publication ethics. This policy is aligned with the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)

The use of AI technologies—including, but not limited to, Large Language Models (LLMs), AI-powered chatbots, AI writing assistants, image generators, code-generation tools, and other generative AI applications—is permitted only when their use is fully disclosed, scientifically appropriate, and does not compromise the integrity, originality, or reliability of the scholarly record.

1. Disclosure of AI Use

At the time of manuscript submission, authors must disclose any use of AI technologies during the research, writing, editing, or preparation of the manuscript. The disclosure should clearly specify:

AI use must be disclosed in the appropriate section of the manuscript:

Failure to disclose the use of AI may be considered a breach of publication ethics.

2. AI Cannot Be Listed as an Author

Artificial Intelligence systems, including chatbots and Large Language Models, must not be credited as authors or corresponding authors. In accordance with internationally recognized authorship criteria (e.g., ICMJE recommendations), authors must be able to:

AI technologies cannot fulfill these responsibilities and therefore do not qualify for authorship.

3. Authors' Responsibilities

Authors remain fully responsible for all content submitted to TSS, including any content generated or assisted by AI technologies.

Before submission, authors must:

The use of AI does not transfer responsibility from the authors to the AI system.

4. Research Integrity and Academic Honesty

Authors are responsible for ensuring that AI-assisted content complies with accepted standards of academic integrity.

Authors must ensure that:

5. Prohibited Uses of AI

The following uses of AI are considered unacceptable:

6. Editorial Assessment

The Editors reserve the right to request additional information regarding the use of AI at any stage of the editorial or peer-review process. Where necessary, authors may be asked to provide:

Undisclosed or inappropriate use of AI may result in editorial action, including manuscript rejection, suspension of peer review, publication of corrections, retraction after publication, notification of the authors' institutions where appropriate, or other actions consistent with the journal's publication ethics policies.

7. AI in Peer Review and Editorial Processes

Editors and peer reviewers who handle manuscripts submitted to TSS must not upload confidential manuscripts, reviewer reports, or unpublished data into publicly accessible AI systems if doing so could compromise confidentiality, copyright, intellectual property, or data protection obligations. Editors and reviewers remain personally responsible for maintaining the confidentiality and integrity of the peer-review process in accordance with the journal's ethical standards.

8. Policy Updates

Because AI technologies continue to evolve rapidly, TSS reserves the right to revise this policy periodically to remain consistent with international best practices, developments in publication ethics, and recommendations issued by COPE and other recognized scholarly publishing organizations.