Jurnal Keperawatan Olahraga

Vol 2 No 01 (2026): Journal of Sports Nursing, Medical, And Health (JSNMH)
Original Research Articles

Family Support and Degree of Injury are Determinants of Quality of Life in Patients with Ankle Injury: A Cross-Sectional Correlational Study

pdf (English)
  • Laili Nur Rahma Novita Fitroh,
  • Moh. Ubaidillah Faqih,
  • Kusno Ferianto,
  • Lukman Hakim
Laili Nur Rahma Novita Fitroh
Department of Nursing, Institut Ilmu Kesehatan Nahdlatul Ulama Tuban
Moh. Ubaidillah Faqih
Department of Nursing, Institut Ilmu Kesehatan Nahdlatul Ulama Tuban
##plugins.themes.classic.biography##
Kusno Ferianto
Department of Nursing, Institut Ilmu Kesehatan Nahdlatul Ulama Tuban
##plugins.themes.classic.biography##
Lukman Hakim
Department of Nursing, Institut Ilmu Kesehatan Nahdlatul Ulama Tuban
##plugins.themes.classic.biography##
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69606/sportnursmedhealth.v2i01.423

Diterbitkan 2026-01-31

Kata Kunci

  • Ankle Injury, Degree of Injury, Family Support, Quality of Life

Cara Mengutip

Fitroh, L. N. R. N., Faqih, M. U., Ferianto, K., & Hakim, L. (2026). Family Support and Degree of Injury are Determinants of Quality of Life in Patients with Ankle Injury: A Cross-Sectional Correlational Study. Jurnal Keperawatan Olahraga, 2(01), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.69606/sportnursmedhealth.v2i01.423

Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Laili Nur Rahma Novita Fitroh, Moh. Ubaidillah Faqih, Kusno Ferianto, Lukman Hakim

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Abstrak

Background: Ankle injuries may lead to activity limitations and reduced quality of life. Family support and injury severity are believed to be related to quality of life in ankle injury patients, but empirical evidence in Indonesia remains limited. Aims:  This study investigated the relationship between injury severity, family support, and quality of life among patients with ankle injuries attending the Physiotherapy Clinic in Palang District. Methods: A cross-sectional correlational study was conducted with 101 patients selected through simple random sampling. Data were collected using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire, the Talar Tilt Test, and the Family Support Scale (FSS), and analyzed using Spearman’s Rho. Results:  The study found a significant positive relationship between family support and quality of life (p=0.000; r=0.647), indicating that higher family support is associated with better quality of life. A significant negative relationship was also found between the degree of injury and quality of life (p=0.000; r=0,511), indicating that more severe injuries are associated with lower quality of life; and 4). Conclusion:  Quality of life in patients with ankle injuries is significantly influenced by family support and injury severity; greater family support improves quality of life, while more severe injuries reduce it

pdf (English)

Referensi

  1. Abdurrahman, M., Putri, A. L., & Rahman, H. (2022). The impact of family support on quality of life in musculoskeletal injury patients: A cross-sectional study. Indonesian Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences, 3(2), 112-125.
  2. Alfian, L., Akbar, B. M., Khasanah, A. U. A., & Afifah, Z. N. (2024). A physiotherapy management in ankle sprain cases using TENS modality and exercise therapy. Jurnal Fisioterapi dan Rehabilitasi, 3(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.24127/fisioterapi.v3i1.5334
  3. Anggraini, R., Susilo, W. H., & Handayani, S. (2022). Gender differences in family support provision for patients with chronic conditions. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 11(8), 4521-4528.
  4. Cahyono, L. (2021). The role of psychosocial support in ankle injury rehabilitation: A systematic review. Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, 8(3), 112-125.
  5. Clark, A., Das, J. M., & Mesfin, F. B. (2024). Trauma neurological exam. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507915/
  6. Delahunt, E., Bleakley, C. M., Bossard, D. S., Caulfield, B. M., Docherty, C. L., Doherty, C., Hertel, J., Hiller, C. E., Kaminski, T. W., McKeon, P. O., Refshauge, K. M., Remus, A., Verhagen, E., Vicenzino, B. T., Wikstrom, E. A., & Gribble, P. A. (2018). Clinical assessment of acute lateral ankle sprain injuries (ROAST): 2019 consensus statement and recommendations of the International Ankle Consortium. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 52(20), 1304-1310.
  7. Fiscarina, W., Yulianto, D., & Susanti, R. (2023). The effectiveness of family education programs in improving care quality for post-stroke patients. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 10(2), 198-205.
  8. Friedman, M. M. (2010). Buku ajar keperawatan keluarga: Riset, teori, & praktik (5th ed.). EGC.
  9. Gribble, P. A., Kleis, R. C., Simon, J. E., Vela, L. I., & Thomas, A. C. (2022). Differences in health-related quality of life among patients after ankle injury. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 4, 909921.
  10. Houston, M. N., Hoch, J. M., & Hoch, M. C. (2015). Health-related quality of life in individuals with chronic ankle instability. Journal of Athletic Training, 50(11), 1167-1173.
  11. Langhammer, B., Stanghelle, J. K., & Lindmark, B. (2018). Functional independence and quality of life in patients with severe ankle injuries: A longitudinal study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 40(5), 523-530.
  12. Melanson, S. W., & Shuman, V. L. (2023). Acute ankle sprain. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459212/
  13. Mohrsen, B., Paxton, E. S., & Patel, D. (2024). Psychological factors in chronic ankle instability: A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 54(3), 623-640.
  14. Nurapandi, M., Kusuma, H., & Rahayu, S. (2024). The correlation between family support and anxiety levels in orthopedic trauma patients. Orthopaedic Nursing Journal, 5(1), 45-58.
  15. Oyesenya, C., Jones, P., & Davies, M. (2021). The impact of ankle injuries on physical and psychosocial well-being: A qualitative study. Injury Prevention, 27(3), 204-210.
  16. Pachana, N. A., Helmes, E., & Koder, D. (2025). Successful aging and rehabilitation: Integrating medical, psychological and social factors. Clinical Psychology Review, 45, 112-128.
  17. Ramadhani, F., Putri, D. E., & Sari, N. K. (2022). Family support and treatment adherence in chronic disease management: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 28(4), e13045.
  18. Samuelkamaleshkumar, S., Reethajanetsureka, S., Pauljebaraj, P., Benshamir, B., Padankatti, S. M., & David, J. A. (2021). Role of family support in rehabilitation of individuals with neurological impairments. Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice, 12(1), 54-62.
  19. Syara, N. D., Rahman, A., & Hidayat, T. (2024). The effectiveness of family education on early mobilization for post-ankle injury patients. Journal of Orthopaedic Nursing, 18(2), 87-95.
  20. Terada, M., Pfile, K. R., Pietrosimone, B. G., & Gribble, P. A. (2020). Effects of chronic ankle instability on energy expenditure during gait. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 52(7), 1424-1431.
  21. Uddin, M. A., & Bhuiyan, A. J. (2019). Development of the family support scale (FSS) for elderly people. MOJ Gerontology & Geriatrics, 4(1), 17-20.
  22. World Health Organization. (2012). WHOQOL-HIV BREF, 2012 revision. WHO. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-MSD-MER-Rev-2012-02